Welcome to The A Block, Awful Announcing’s daily newsletter, where you’ll always find the latest sports media news, commentary, and analysis.

Did someone share this newsletter with you? Sign up for free to make sure you never miss it.

📉 Content shutdown. Underdog is shutting down its original content arm entirely, ending The Arena, the spinoff The Arena: Gridiron, and its Josh Norris/Hayden Winks fantasy football show, effective immediately, as the company pivots back to its core prediction-market and fantasy products. The move comes just weeks after Gilbert Arenas' turbulent exit from the flagship show, which saw three co-hosts let go and the Gil's Arena name revert back to Arenas this summer.

🥊 Streaming over broadcast. Conor McGregor's UFC return at UFC 329 will air exclusively on Paramount+, with CBS relegated to a Friday-night weigh-in special rather than any live fight coverage. It's the same strategy Paramount deployed for June's Freedom 250, which drew roughly 7 million streaming-only viewers and an 184% spike in Paramount+ app downloads, proving a smaller subscriber audience is worth more than a bigger free one on CBS.

⚖️ Denial after arrest. Marcellus Wiley was arrested Saturday in Orlando on a domestic battery charge and released Sunday on $1,000 bond, with the arrest affidavit alleging he threatened to kill his wife and poked her in the cheek, though she showed no visible injuries and told police she plans to divorce him. Wiley has since issued a statement "completely and unequivocally" denying the allegations without addressing any specifics, suggesting the report is tied to the looming divorce.

🎙️ Undecided future. Geno Auriemma isn't sure broadcasting is his post-coaching path, telling the Sports Media with Richard Deitsch podcast he's already recorded roughly a dozen episodes of a WME-produced podcast set for a fall launch — though only two guests so far have basketball ties — while still weighing whether the travel grind of a full broadcasting career is worth it.

⚾ Netflix and Derby. Elle Duncan says she isn't calling the action during next week's Home Run Derby, describing a two-set format designed to keep her away from play-by-play, with Matt Vasgersian handling the calls while she holds down a "more loungey set" with Barry Bonds and Albert Pujols. It's her second live MLB event since leaving ESPN in December, and Netflix takes over the Derby for the first time at Citizens Bank Park, ending ESPN's run with the event dating back to 1994 as part of Netflix's three-year, roughly $50 million-per-year MLB deal.

Read more of today’s top stories at Awful Announcing.

FIFA had a chance to just say no, and it didn't take it.

That's the part getting lost before — and after — the U.S. men's national team's World Cup ended Monday night against Belgium with Folarin Balogun back in the lineup.

Balogun was sent off in last Wednesday's win over Bosnia, and FIFA initially affirmed the suspension, meaning he'd miss the round of 16. Then, less than a day and a half before kickoff, the governing body reversed course and suspended the ban for a year. Belgium said it never got an explanation. And by Monday morning, reports from multiple outlets, including the New York Post, had the Trump administration directly involved in getting the decision overturned, right down to threats to pursue a global court challenge.

Trump confirmed it himself hours before the match, framing his intervention as a simple correction of a bad call while also noting that Balogun is one of the team's best players. That's not a throwaway line. It's the entire controversy in one sentence. Nobody's making late-night calls to FIFA's president over a backup fullback, and the fact that it took a star player's suspension to trigger this kind of pressure campaign is exactly why the reversal looks as bad as it does.

None of that makes FIFA a bystander here. The organization had the authority to simply uphold its own ruling and let the political pressure crash into a wall. Instead, it caved, and it caved on a timeline that made the optics as damaging as possible. The decision came down on Sunday, with games still being played on Friday and Saturday during the holiday weekend, leaving Belgium with barely more than a day to adjust its preparations for a completely different U.S. attack. If FIFA reverses this Thursday or Friday, the story is a governing body correcting an officiating mistake with enough runway for both sides to adjust. Instead, the timing collapsed into the White House's press conference, and now nobody's talking about the officiating anymore.

That's the frustrating irony buried in all of this. Plenty of neutral soccer voices, including Fox Sports analyst Mark Clattenburg, said in real time that the red card shouldn't have stood, that it was an overly literal freeze-frame reading of a collision, not a deliberate foul. If FIFA reaches that same conclusion on its own, on its own schedule, this isn't a story about presidential influence peddling. It's a story about a governing body admitting a mistake. FIFA had the cleaner path available and chose the murkier one, and it's going to wear the consequences of that choice regardless of how the White House wants to spin its own involvement.

It's also not as if FIFA's credibility was pristine walking into this. Between World Cup hosting decisions, media rights deals, and years of governance controversies, plenty of people already assume the worst about how FIFA operates behind closed doors. That history is exactly why so much of the public reaction skipped past shock and went straight to jokes about corruption finally breaking America's way. FIFA didn't get the benefit of the doubt here because it hasn't earned it, and Gianni Infantino's own well-documented ties to Trump — including FIFA renting U.S. office space in a Trump-owned building — only reinforce why nobody's treating this reversal as a coincidence.

Trump is going to move on to the next available headline. FIFA doesn't get that luxury. It still has to govern the rest of this tournament, still has to explain itself to Belgium, and still has to answer for a decision it made with full knowledge of how it would look. The administration applied the pressure, sure. But FIFA is the one that picked up the phone, changed the ruling, and let the timing do the rest of the damage on its own.

And then Belgium won 4-1, and the whole fight over one red card stopped being about soccer at all.

It didn't matter, and that's the actual point. The entire case for FIFA's involvement rested on the idea that the U.S.'s best player being available was worth bending the process for. Balogun went out and played like the team's best player. The U.S. still lost by three goals. If this was ever genuinely about the result and not the optics of standing up for a player, this is the result that was supposed to prove it — and it didn't. FIFA doesn't get to say the reversal mattered on the field, because it didn't change the outcome. All that's left is the process itself: an organization that had the standing to uphold its own ruling chose not to, and did it in a way that made the politics impossible to separate from the sport.

Folarin Balogun started for the USMNT against Belgium on Monday night after Donald Trump reportedly called FIFA president Gianni Infantino to push for the lifting of his one-game suspension. Sam Neumann and Brendon Kleen break down the full timeline, the fallout across the soccer world, and what it says about the media's handling of a story that blurred the line between sports governance and politics on the biggest stage American soccer has ever had. Plus, a look at the controversy around Michael Strahan's interview with Chris Johnson last week and where the ethical line sits on reporting on football players' health.

Listen on Apple Podcasts | Listen on Spotify

"I don't think they get along at all. Everything I've heard all along is that they don't like each other." — Mike Francesa, dismissing Juan Soto and Francisco Lindor's public reconciliation and claiming his own sources say the Mets plan to trade Lindor and build around Soto.

"As I've been seeing these photos of everybody else at the wedding, I'm kinda flabbergasted why we didn't get the invite." — Former NFL linebacker Will Compton, still processing his snub from Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift's wedding after noticing that Fox Sports rules analyst Dean Blandino made the guest list.

"That's the one man who's never turned his back on me." — Shannon Sharpe, crediting Stephen A. Smith for calling him every week throughout his legal troubles since leaving ESPN.

"I just want to go get completely drunk, forget about tennis, and try to get in better shape." — Aryna Sabalenka, on her plans after a shock fourth-round exit to Naomi Osaka at Wimbledon.

"I disagreed with that, but I don't care because I said I'm leaving anyway." — Former SportsCenter anchor Craig Kilborn, recalling how ESPN suspended him for a week without pay — and without explanation — after he mocked ESPN2 on air.

"It's bullsh*t that this is about hydration ... this is a way to get an ad break in the first half and an ad break in the second half." — John Skipper, rejecting FIFA president Gianni Infantino's claim that World Cup hydration breaks are purely a "sporting matter."

Stephen A. Smith has conquered the sports world. When it comes to sports talking heads, no one has wider name recognition. He's the subject of New York Times profiles and Saturday Night Live parodies. Your mom may not know exactly who he is or what he does, but she's definitely heard the name Stephen A. Smith.

For most in this business, that would be more than enough to satisfy their ambition. Smith has never been shy about what he wants, though. He doesn't plan on giving up his place in sports fans' minds and on their screens, but he also wants to occupy a similar perch in cable news.

Last week, Smith spoke at the Barrett Audio Summit in New York, and he echoed something he has said repeatedly: that he believes he could be successful in primetime on cable news. He even has an idea for the show he wants to do.

…

Click to read more from Awful Announcing's Demetri Ravanos, who argues Smith is overcomplicating his shot at cable news success — and explains what it would take for him to actually pull it off.